PLAN Litchfield Protect Litchfield Action Network

Take our survey AND Also Sign the petition: Stop Giant Stop & Shop 

This wall isn’t even 18 ft. We are facing an 18 ft wall plus 6 foot fence on top.

THE PROBLEM:

Mark Greenberg and his development company have signed a lease with Stop and Shop. The plan is proposes to tear down two buildings on the Village Green property and Stop and Shop will build a 39,000 sf new building for Stop and Shop.  Stop and Shop will have more space to make more profit, and Mr Greenberg will have a good tenant, but what about these other consequences:

  • Increased run off from the larger parking lot will pollute the water table and the wetlands. Note that this property is on the Aquifer protection area- protecting Litchfield’s water supply.
  • There will be a large vacant store where Stop and Shop is now.
  • Several small businesses including Bosson Optical, the Litchfield Laundry, and the Business Center – will be displaced in order to expand the parking lot.
  • The larger building will require significantly more parking and generate more traffic.
  • There will be even more paving and less green space on the Village Green property.
  • The larger Stop and Shop will make the property less like a “Village Green” and more like a mall:  it will erode the rural character of our town.
  • The larger Stop and Shop will remove more of our dollars from the local economy to feed the profits of a large multinational corporation (Ahold- with profits of over 30 Billion Euros last year).
  • The local citizens will know that the landlords and businesses put their own profits ahead of the needs of the community

A possible SOLUTION:  Stop and Shop can have more space and still preserve the small, precious rural character of Litchfield:  Have Rite Aid move to the vacant former Market in Village Green and let Stop and Shop expand into the vacated Rite Aid space

  • There would be no empty buildings left as eyesores.
  • There would not be a large parking lot and excessively large big box store built in our small town.
  • A perfectly useful group of storefronts would be preserved for local and small businesses to occupy, facilitating walking between businesses at Village Green.
  • Traffic patterns would remain the same.   If the POCAD’s* recommendations are heeded, traffic flow could be improved by building  a new egress onto Constitution Way.
  • Stop and Shop could expand into the vacated space, serve the needs of Litchfield shoppers and save money on a move.
  • Both shopping centers would have occupied buildings .
  • Litchfield avoids the disruption of demolition and construction
  • The landlords and businesses will be appreciated as reasonable and creative members of our community.

What can you do?

  • Come to the Wetlands and P&Z meetings:                                                                                                Next meeting is P&Z, Monday August 20, 2012, 7 PM at the Town Annex gym, 80 Doyle Road, Bantam, CT
  • Write a letter to the editor using talking points below
  • Sign our online petition/ take the survey

Talking and writing points:

PRESERVE:

We would rather keep more local businesses intact, juggle some businesses around rather than displace businesses.

FILL IN THE BLANKS:

We would like to fill the empty buildings in our town rather than create  another huge big box store that leaves a large, vacant store on our main road,

SUBTRACT:

We prefer to minimize traffic and keep our pedestrians safe.  Traffic on route 202 is already a problem.  We do not want to create more. [1]

CONSERVE:

We love supporting local businesses and wish to spend our money on local Litchfield businesses rather than send our money out of state and out of country for a multi-national corporation’s profit.  We love the small town and precious rural character of our town and wish the town regulations reflected these wishes by having restrictions on the size of new construction.[3]

PLAN

Even though the Plan of Conservation and Development has recommended it, there are no regulations on the size of commercial construction in Litchfield.  Local citizens attended P&Z meetings in April, May and June of 2012 to urge them to adopt such a regulation, but the Planning and Zoning Commission has failed to respond.[3]

[1] Facts: about the POCAD (Plan of Conservation and Development (see pages 24-25) http://www.townoflitchfield.org/Pages/LitchfieldCT_Land/POCAD%20Adopted%20June%204,%202007.pdf

[2] Facts: How big is 39,000 sf? Almost the size of a football field minus the end-zones.

[3] More Facts: There are no regulations on the size of construction in Litchfield and despite the urging of local citizens at meetings in April, May and June of 2012 and the POCAD recommendations suggesting the same from 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission has failed to write any new regulations. Town of Litchfield Planning and Zoning Regulations:

http://www.townoflitchfield.org/Pages/LitchfieldCT_Land/regs/inde

About these ads

4 thoughts on “PLAN Litchfield Protect Litchfield Action Network

  1. It seems to me that the citizens have livical feasible and purdent alternatives that benefit the developer and the town. Thee wetlands commission are required to seek out these alternatives. Besides it does not appear that a larger box store and displacing local business with increased traffic in Route 202 is in compliance with the Plan of Conservation and a development. P&Z can not allow such an application to go forward if it does not comply. Recently developer have sough to destroy the rual historic character of this wonderful community. Keep with your predecessors actions your descendant will be greatful for your efforts today. Good luck

  2. I’m shocked to see only 2 other comments on this issue. Why such a focus on just the wetlands, because that organization has such pull? How about focusing on the schlep Greenberg? He can’t make a simple comment to the paper because he’s busy planning a debate? This is a debate you idiot!!! Not to mention the Goshen hardware store was closed because he didn’t pay his bills. He doesn’t care about Litchfield or anything else but winning this election to boost his ego and wallet.

    • Not sure why Mark did not pay his bill. But I assume it was not because he could not afford it. Lol. I would commit on his faith but his politics I will. He does not have a chance. I am not worried at all. As for this project going through I can not see how it could. This is in the aquifer protection zone. It would not have a positive impact to the community with the increase in traffic on Route 202. The project does not comply with the plan of conservation and development.

      Honestly I can not see why stop & shop is even interested. They can move rite out and expand thier. This makes no sence. Plus putting a store like this behind other buildings does not appear pleasant or is a sound business decsion. Look at Center Subaru an Big Y in Torrington. How much did they pay for the new Lowes and Big Y and all the old horrible look buildings remain in front. What owner want to tuck away thier business. I can not see how this project could even get approved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s